Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960492›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Patient satisfaction and OHRQoL in single-piece implant full-mouth rehabilitation versus fixed bridges.

Sadaf Farheen, Kota Bharathi, Aditi Kanitkar, Deepika C S, Remya Ravi, Padminii Ellapakurthi, Heena Dixit Tiwari

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadaf FarheenDepartment of dental surgery, Mamata Dental College and Hospital, Khammam, Telangana, India.
Kota BharathiDepartment of Periodontics, Mamata Institute of Dental Sciences, Bachupally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Aditi KanitkarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Deepika C SDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences & Research, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Remya RaviDepartment of Prosthodontics, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences & Research, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Padminii EllapakurthiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Heena Dixit TiwariBlood Cell, Commissionerate of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete edentulism rehabilitation remains challenging because conventional fixed bridges often fail to achieve optimal long-term patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Therefore, it is of interest to compare patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between single-piece implant-supported full-mouth rehabilitation and conventional fixed bridges in completely edentulous patients. Results demonstrated significantly higher OHRQoL and satisfaction scores among implant-supported cases, emphasizing improved functional stability, aesthetics and psychological well-being. Thus, single-piece implants achieved superior patient-reported outcomes and greater rehabilitation predictability.

Indexed as

Dental Implantsedentulous jaw rehabilitationfixed prosthesisoral health-related quality of lifepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41960492
PMCPMC13058301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.