Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960475›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparative evaluation of marginal bone loss and prosthetic success in immediate versus delayed implant loading protocols: A radiographic study.

Nakul Chaudhary, Chinmay Sharadchandra Dave, Prachi Sharma, Devisree R V, Gunjan Gupta, Shailendra Pal Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nakul ChaudharyDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Chinmay Sharadchandra DaveDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
Prachi SharmaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Devisree R VDepartment of Periodontology, Azeezia College of Dental Sciences and Research, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Gunjan GuptaDepartment of Periodontology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shailendra Pal SinghDepartment of Periodontology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of the effects of immediate and delayed implant loading protocols on marginal bone loss and prosthetic success over a 12-month period is highly relevant. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the effects of immediate and delayed implant loading protocols on marginal bone loss and prosthetic success over 12 months. Hence, a total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to either the immediate or delayed loading group. Results showed that the delayed loading group experienced significantly less marginal bone loss and better bone preservation. Implant survival and prosthetic success rates were high in both groups, with no significant differences observed. Thus, we show that while immediate loading provides aesthetic advantages, delayed loading may offer better long-term bone preservation.

Indexed as

Dental implantsimmediate loadingmarginal bone lossprosthetic success

Identifiers

PMID41960475
PMCPMC13058384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.