Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960471›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Short dental implants versus sinus lift with longer implants.

Trapti Jaiswal, Radhika Tamloorker, Prashant S Patil, Pooja Singh, Nisha Mishra, Sanobar Sultana, Tanvi Hirani

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trapti JaiswalDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Index Institute of Dental Sciences (IIDS), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Radhika TamloorkerDepartment of Dental Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
Prashant S PatilDeparment of Prosthodontics, Yogita dental college and hospital, Khed, Maharashtra, India.
Pooja SinghDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Nisha MishraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Index Institute of Dental Sciences (IIDS), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sanobar SultanaPrivatePractitioner, Impressions Dental Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Tanvi HiraniDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of the posterior atrophic maxilla is a difficult task because of the low bone height and the invasiveness of the sinus-lift surgeries. Therefore, it is of interest to discuss the comparison of clinical outcomes of short dental implants (less than 6 mm) and sinus augmentation using longer implants (more than 10 mm) in 94 patients within 36 months. Also short implants demonstrated high survival rate of 96.6 compared to long implants which had high survival rate of 95.5 and marginal bone loss was similar but less complications and less time on treatment. Their clinical efficiency is demonstrated by the lowered morbidity and the similar success. Short implants can therefore be used as a valid and reliable option in the minimally invasive rehabilitation of the maxilla.

Indexed as

atrophic maxillacomplication ratemarginal bone lossShort dental implantssinus floor augmentationsurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID41960471
PMCPMC13058338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.