Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960449›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Clinical evaluation of open flap debridement with or without Emdogain® in treating intrabony defects.

Simrita Singh, Vandana Saranga, Sahib Tej Singh, Vidhuta Sareen, Simranjit Kaur, Sakshi Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simrita SinghDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Vandana SarangaDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Sahib Tej SinghDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Vidhuta SareenDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Simranjit KaurDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Sakshi VermaDepartment of Periodontology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontitis causes intrabony defects and while open flap debridement (OFD) with EMD and GTR shows promise, the comparative effectiveness of EMD in treating these defects remains underexplored. Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap surgery is used in conjunction with biological factors such as enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and regenerative techniques involving guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in order to overcome these intrabony defects. In numerous clinical investigations, the application of EMD has demonstrated notable clinical improvements in bone fill clinical attachment gain and pocket depth reduction. Thus, the clinical effectiveness of open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in treating periodontal intrabony defects, further exploring EMD's contribution to clinical outcomes such as bone fill, attachment gain and pocket depth reduction is reported.

Indexed as

Clinical attachment gainEnamel matrix derivative (EMD)Open flap debridementperiodontal intrabony defectsRegenerative techniques

Identifiers

PMID41960449
PMCPMC13058367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.