ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Budget impact of wastewater surveillance for COVID-19 in a large urban jail: an activity-based cost analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Correctional facilities were disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreaks. Wastewater surveillance programs (WSP) may provide early warnings of the presence of COVID-19 and facilitate the timely implementation of infection mitigation, but their budgetary implications for correctional systems remain unclear. Methods: We conducted an activity-based costing analysis of a pilot WSP in a large urban jail. Costs borne by the jail were assessed and included start-up investments, implementation expenditures, and the costs of confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing (PCR test). We developed budget impact scenarios based on the number of outflow points testing positive and the confirmatory testing required in the cellblocks linked to them. We also conducted a scenario analysis using rapid antigen tests in place of PCR tests. Results: Initial start-up costs totaled $29,471. Implementation costs for testing a single outflow point, linked to seven cellblocks, were $16,802, with PCR-testing accounting for 78% of expenditures. Implementation costs varied from $4,403 for zero positive outflow tests to $125,965 for eight positive outflow tests. Use of rapid antigen tests reduced costs significantly. Conclusion: Adoption of wastewater surveillance with confirmatory testing in correctional settings may entail substantial costs. The budget impact is likely to be highly sensitive to confirmatory test type, sewer configuration, and the specificity of the wastewater sample to a location. These findings underscore the need for correctional administrators to investigate feasibility and affordability when considering the use of WSP to help protect incarcerated populations from infectious disease threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.