ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Fall detection and pre-impact prediction technologies in older adults: a scoping review of translational maturity and public health integration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To map the current landscape of wearable and sensor-based fall detection and pre-impact prediction technologies relevant to older adults and to evaluate their translational maturity within public health contexts. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were systematically searched for studies published between January 2005 and September 2025. Eligible studies reported the development or validation of fall detection or pre-impact prediction systems incorporating wearable, vision-based, environmental, or multimodal sensing modalities. In total, 243 studies were included in the overall synthesis, with a predefined subgroup of 21 studies involving real-world or mixed real-world validation in older adult populations (≥65 years). Results: Across the 243 included studies, wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based systems constituted the dominant technological stream, and post-fall detection remained the most frequently investigated functional objective. However, more than half of studies relied primarily on laboratory-based simulated fall protocols. Within the real-world validated older adult subgroup ( Conclusion: Although technological innovation in fall-related sensing systems has expanded rapidly, translational maturity remains uneven. Bridging the gap between algorithmic performance and scalable public health implementation will require robust real-world validation, longitudinal adherence evaluation, implementation science frameworks, and economic assessment. Advancing along a continuum from reactive detection toward predictive and personalized prevention represents a critical pathway for supporting safe and independent aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.