ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Weighted vest interventions in older adults: a mini-review of implementation, benefits, and limitations.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weighted vests (WVs) enable adjustable external loading during daily activities and exercise. Although experimental studies in older adults exist, their findings have not been comprehensively integrated. This narrative review summarizes implementation, main findings, and limitations. In October 2025, we searched Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOhost and conducted backward and forward citation searching. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, English-language reports in adults aged ≥60 years. Fifteen articles were included and synthesized qualitatively. Implementation should begin with assessment and safety screening. WV use follows two modes-wear-only and task-based-and should emphasize conservative starts, gradual loading, and ongoing monitoring and adjustment. Across the limited available studies, benefits tended to be observed in task-based, progressively loaded prescriptions, including improvements in selected neuromuscular measures and, in some settings, maintenance of hip bone mineral density. Across available studies, low-load wear-only protocols generally did not demonstrate measurable improvements in musculoskeletal outcomes. Psychological gains, when present, were modest and setting-specific, and broad improvements in health-related quality of life were not observed. Although adverse events were generally mild, usability challenges and a higher number of recorded falls in one trial justify cautious implementation. Given persistent limitations in sample size, reliance on self-report, and protocol heterogeneity, adequately powered multicenter trials with objective wear-time assessment, harmonized outcomes, and extended follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.