ArticleResearch square2026
Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling to Characterize the Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Mithramycin Analogue for Ewing Sarcoma in Mice.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a pharmacokinetic model for a novel mithramycin analogue, MTMSA-Trp, in mice and characterize dose-dependent disposition to support future pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and exposure-efficacy analyses. Methods: Non-linear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model in MonolixSuite 2024R1 using 121 plasma concentrations from 70 female athymic nude mice after single IV bolus doses of 0.3, 1, 3, 5, and 10 mg/kg. Model selection was guided by the objective function value (OFV), parameter precision, and diagnostic plots. The final model was evaluated using bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) and visual predictive checks (VPC; 1000 simulated datasets). Results: A one-compartment model with first-order elimination and an empirical power relationship between dose and clearance best described the data. Including dose as a covariate in the clearance model significantly improved model fit relative to the linear base model (ΔOFV = - 26.19). Typical clearance and volume of distribution were 39.18 mL/h/kg (at 3 mg/kg) and 53.06 mL/kg, respectively, and the dose-clearance exponent was β = -0.30, indicating decreasing clearance with increasing dose. Fixed-effect parameters were estimated with high precision (RSE ≤ 11%). Shrinkage was high for clearance (81%) and moderate for volume of distribution (39.1%). Bootstrap and VPC results supported model robustness and predictive performance. Conclusion: A robust popPK model describing dose-dependent MTMSA-Trp disposition in mice was developed and is suitable for simulation to support subsequent PK/PD and exposure-efficacy analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.