Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960319›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Predicting Future Organ Support Needs Using Longitudinal Emergency Department Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Samuel Chiacchia, Katie Lebold, Andrew Moore, Hayley Hedlin, Christian Rose, David Kim, Jenny Wilson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel ChiacchiaStanford Medicine.
Katie LeboldOregon Health & Science University.
Andrew MooreStanford Medicine.
Hayley HedlinStanford Medicine.
Christian RoseStanford Medicine.
David KimStanford Medicine.
Jenny WilsonStanford Medicine.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Research and EducationUM1TR004921 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MANISHA DESAI, DEAN W FELSHER · 2024 to 2026
$30.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prediction of organ support needs, rather than mortality or critical care transfer alone, may improve the utility of early warning scores (EWS). Existing EWS may have limited sensitivity in predicting organ support due to reliance on cross-sectional snapshots of patient physiology, limiting their ability to account for changes in patient status. We aimed to develop and compare novel models capable of using longitudinal clinical data to predict organ support or death (OSD) within 48 hours of hospital admission. Methods: We leveraged a retrospective cohort of adult ED encounters at a U.S. quaternary academic medical center from March 1, 2022, to February 5, 2024. Encounters were included if patients were ≥ 18 years and admitted to a medical service; those receiving organ support in the ED were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of vasopressor initiation, invasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or death within 48 hours of admission. Performance metrics included AUROC, AUPRC, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: 1.7% (549/32,329) experienced organ support or death within 48 hours of admission. The transformer-based neural net demonstrated the strongest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.84 and AUPRC of 0.20, outperforming the baseline to National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) with higher sensitivity for the primary outcome (0.78 vs. 0.61) while maintaining sufficient specificity (0.71 vs. 0.83). XGBoost and elastic-net regression showed similar improvements in sensitivity (both 0.83) with modest reductions in specificity relative to NEWS2 calculated at time of admission. Conclusions: Organ support represents a potentially modifiable and temporally proximal marker of critical illness. Models trained to interpret longitudinal trends in clinical variables-rather than cross-sectional snapshots-may better mirror clinician reasoning.

Indexed as

emergency critical careorgan supporttime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41960319
PMCPMC13060519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.