ArticleResearch square2026
Predicting Future Organ Support Needs Using Longitudinal Emergency Department Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prediction of organ support needs, rather than mortality or critical care transfer alone, may improve the utility of early warning scores (EWS). Existing EWS may have limited sensitivity in predicting organ support due to reliance on cross-sectional snapshots of patient physiology, limiting their ability to account for changes in patient status. We aimed to develop and compare novel models capable of using longitudinal clinical data to predict organ support or death (OSD) within 48 hours of hospital admission. Methods: We leveraged a retrospective cohort of adult ED encounters at a U.S. quaternary academic medical center from March 1, 2022, to February 5, 2024. Encounters were included if patients were ≥ 18 years and admitted to a medical service; those receiving organ support in the ED were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of vasopressor initiation, invasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or death within 48 hours of admission. Performance metrics included AUROC, AUPRC, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: 1.7% (549/32,329) experienced organ support or death within 48 hours of admission. The transformer-based neural net demonstrated the strongest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.84 and AUPRC of 0.20, outperforming the baseline to National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) with higher sensitivity for the primary outcome (0.78 vs. 0.61) while maintaining sufficient specificity (0.71 vs. 0.83). XGBoost and elastic-net regression showed similar improvements in sensitivity (both 0.83) with modest reductions in specificity relative to NEWS2 calculated at time of admission. Conclusions: Organ support represents a potentially modifiable and temporally proximal marker of critical illness. Models trained to interpret longitudinal trends in clinical variables-rather than cross-sectional snapshots-may better mirror clinician reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.