ArticleResearch square2026
Application of Process Mapping to catalyze integration of HIV services in cancer care.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization advocates for integrated health services in low- and middle-income countries, with special focus on care for non-communicable diseases within HIV care. HIV diagnosis and management with antiretroviral therapy (ART) are crucial components of whole-person care; in addition to improving overall survival, ART provides basic immunotherapy during cancer treatment. However, most cancer centers in Africa are not currently equipped to provide integrated HIV care. We conducted process mapping at referral cancer centers in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe to identify mechanisms of integrating HIV care interventions within established cancer treatment processes. Methods: Our research consortium identified multidisciplinary clinical and non-clinical staff important to care delivery in four referral cancer hospitals and proximal HIV clinics. Consortium-level researchers met separately in-person or virtually with each site team to conduct training. High-level and detailed levels process maps were developed in process mapping sessions with diverse staff at each site and flow diagrams created to identify sites of opportunity for care integration within cancer centers. Results: Forty-five diverse clinical and non-clinical staff participated in the process across the 4 cancer centers. Several points were identified in which care integration was already occurring, including requesting HIV diagnostic and monitoring laboratory tests and clinical consideration of HIV in care plan development. While HIV care was already available in a clinic within the same hospital campus in Soweto and referral and results pathways were more integrated than the other 3 sites, none of the centers provided ART, and all lacked the capacity to provide HIV-specific counseling and management of ART or non-cancer HIV complications. Discussion: We identified multiple points at which persons in HIV care were referred for cancer treatment and where people in cancer treatment not previously known to be living with HIV or not currently on ART could be referred for HIV treatment. Some services, while not integrated, had appropriate pathways in place; for others, we identified intervention points to improve care integration of HIV services into the cancer centers. While each cancer center has distinct features, we identified general service points that could be interrogated for HIV care integration opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.