ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026
The role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years new medicines used in systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) have been successful in reducing cancer mortality. There are concerns, however, regarding the potential impact of socioeconomic position on patients' access to these treatments. This study aims to assess the extent of socioeconomic differences in the initiation, type, and intensity of SACT for cancer patients, and to identify differences that could indicate barriers to treatment. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with solid cancers in the North Denmark Region 2008 to 2020 using the Danish Cancer Registry. Socioeconomic position was categorized using income, highest attained education, cohabitation status, ethnicity, and distance to specialized treatment. Outcomes included initiation of SACT, intravenous treatments, different SACT regimens, cost of SACT, only curative therapy, and use of monoclonal antibodies. Analyses were adjusted for age, year, comorbidity, and stage and were stratified by sex, cancer group, and treatment intent. Results: We identified 42 364 patients of whom 12 792 (30.2%) initiated SACT. Socioeconomic differences were observed with lower SACT initiation among patients with lower educational attainment, low income, or living alone. These patient groups also had decreased accumulated cost, intravenous treatments, and fewer different SACT regimens, particularly for gynecological, lung, and upper gastrointestinal cancers. The observed differences were more pronounced among patients treated with palliative intent. Conclusion: This study indicates socioeconomic disparities in SACT utilization, with lower use among disadvantaged patients primarily within palliative treatment regimens. Some of the observed differences warrant further investigation into the complex socioeconomic mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.