Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960272›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The dark side of team dynamics: how team differential atmosphere undermines team creativity.

Yuanzhe Liu, Xiaoqian Qu, Hongzhen Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuanzhe LiuInternational Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoqian QuInternational Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Hongzhen LeiInternational Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Team Differential Atmosphere (TDA)-a climate-level perception of rigid "insider" and "outsider" boundaries created by leaders based on relational closeness-has emerged as an important barrier to creativity in multicultural teams. Although inclusive leadership is widely recognized as a catalyst for innovation, the specific micro-mechanisms by which its opposite, TDA, disrupts team dynamics remain unclear. Drawing on Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT), this study positions TDA as a distinct signal of identity exclusion, distinguishing it from Leader-Member Exchange Differentiation (LMXD). Methods: Data were collected from 79 innovation teams using a multi-source approach, and a moderated mediation model was developed and tested. Results: The results indicate that: (1) TDA, as a manifestation of non-inclusive leadership, significantly inhibits team creativity; (2) this inhibition occurs via two distinct pathways: team collaboration (reduced collaborative behaviors) and joint decision-making (impaired information integration); and (3) team empathy, as a key collective emotional resource, can buffer the detrimental effects of TDA on these processes. Discussion: This study contributes to the literature by distinguishing the "identity threat" signal of TDA from the performance-related signal of LMXD and by clarifying how differential structures can adversely affect team interaction processes and creativity at the team level. It further identifies Team Empathy as a bottom-up resilience resource that buffers these negative effects in multicultural teams.

Indexed as

inclusive leadershipmulticultural teamsteam creativityteam differential atmosphereTeam Empathyteam interaction process

Identifiers

PMID41960272
PMCPMC13056854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.