ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2026
A retrospective review of spinal masses at a South African tertiary neurosurgery unit in Durban (2020-2024).
Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of spinal masses is not well documented in South Africa. Understanding their occurrence, distribution and histopathological spectrum is crucial for optimising diagnosis, treatment, and management strategies in clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis was conducted for patients who underwent spinal surgery for spinal masses between 01 January 2020, and 31 December 2024. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and correlation analyses were used to assess relationships between demographics, mass type, surgical intervention, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 37.74 years (standard deviation [s.d.] 18.19). The most common tumours were schwannomas (28.6%) and meningiomas (21.4%). Laminectomy was the most common surgical procedure performed (60.7%), followed by laminoplasty (21.4%) and fusion (7.1%). A significant negative correlation was found between age and follow-up duration ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated that schwannomas and meningiomas were the most predominant types of spinal masses observed within the cohort. Laminectomy was the principal surgical approach utilised. Contribution: Significant associations between patient age, tumour type, and surgical interventions may inform future clinical decisions and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.