ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2026
Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancies Following Bilateral Partial Salpingectomy: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancies Following Bilateral Partial Salpingectomy: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ectopic pregnancies can be a life-threatening condition in early pregnancy. Risk factors include pelvic inflammatory disease, prior ectopic pregnancy, pelvic surgery, and anatomical variations. Although pregnancy after tubal sterilization is uncommon, recurrent ectopic pregnancy after bilateral partial salpingectomy is rare. Case: A 28-year-old G5P1031 African-American patient who underwent cesarean delivery with bilateral partial salpingectomy. Ten months later, she presented with a right ectopic pregnancy requiring laparoscopic salpingectomy. This was followed by a ruptured left ectopic pregnancy treated with salpingo-oophorectomy 7 months later. Conclusion: This case highlights the rare but serious risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy following partial salpingectomy. Residual tubal segments and young age may contribute to this. Clinicians should consider total salpingectomy when feasible to reduce recurrence and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.