ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Identifying and Improving LGBTQ + Health Competencies in First-Year Medical Undergraduate Education via a Targeted, Peer-Led Educational Intervention.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: LGBTQ + individuals experience significant health disparities, driven in part by a lack of provider knowledge, necessitating effective interventions for medical trainees. This study examined the impact of a 1-h educational intervention for first-year medical students on 6 self-reported competency domains in LGBTQ + health and compared the magnitude of score changes for competencies specifically targeted by the lecture to those that were not. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study. Surveys were distributed before and after a 1-h lecture delivered by an LGBTQ+-identifying senior medical student. Respondents reported data on LGBTQ + identification and prior experience with LGBTQ + health-related topics, and they rated their ability to perform each of 6 LGBTQ + health competencies. Two faculty members with LGBTQ + health expertise blindly reviewed the material and identified which competencies were addressed. Results: Our sample consisted of 38 matched survey response pairs. Students reported significant increases across all 6 competencies, with no significant difference in score changes between competencies that were targeted by the lecture and those that were not. Prior training in LGBTQ + health-related topics did not significantly affect competency scores. LGBTQ + identity was associated with greater score increases for targeted, but not non-targeted, competencies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a 1-h, LGBTQ+-identifying student-delivered lecture can significantly increase students' self-reported comfort with LGBTQ + patient care, regardless of LGBTQ + status or prior training. Scores improved for all competencies, regardless of whether they were targeted by the lecture. Further study is indicated to measure whether increases in competency scores are maintained throughout medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.