Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

From clicks to connection: designing nursing content within an electronic health record that reflects person-centred relationships and choices.

Michele Hardiman, Judith Watkin, Winifred O'Neill, Sinead Hanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michele HardimanBlackrock Health, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland.
Judith WatkinBlackrock Health, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland.
Winifred O'NeillBlackrock Health, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland.
Sinead HanleyBlackrock Health, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are central to healthcare transformation, promising improved access to information, decision support, and safer care delivery. It acts as a central repository of all information pertinent to a person receiving treatment and is easily accessible. This paper presents a an experiential perspective and follow up from a nursing team who led the design, development, and evaluation of a person-centred electronic nursing record within an acute hospital setting. Guided by the Person-centred Practice Framework and participatory approaches to workplace culture development, the team collaborated with informatics specialists to redesign more than 120 assessments, diagnoses, interventions and outcomes that better reflect nursing values, patient choice, and local workflows. Through continuous attention to organisational structures, facilitative processes, and emerging cultural patterns, nurses achieved greater alignment between digital documentation and the realities of bedside practice. Evaluation data demonstrated improved nurse engagement with the EHR, enhanced therapeutic relationships, reduced documentation burden, and strengthened person-centred cultures across the organisation. These findings highlight the critical role of nurses in digital transformation and the need for meaningful input into EHR content design and governance. We argue that digital nursing documentation must reflect the complexity and relational nature of nursing practice, rather than prioritising technical tasks or disease-focused content. As national and international EHR initiatives advance, nursing leadership must influence system procurement, content customisation, and ongoing evaluation to ensure that digital records uphold professional values and support compassionate, holistic, person-centred care.

Indexed as

documentation (nursing)electronic health recordnursingorganisational cultureperson-centrednesstechnology

Identifiers

PMID41960175
PMCPMC13057456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.