Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Integrating theory and practice: the core components guide for rigorous quality improvement design.

Paul Howard, Jafet Arrieta, Chelsey Leruth, Kate Bones, Rebecca Steinfield, Johanna Figueroa, Sonya Panjwani Olaya, Pierre Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul HowardInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Jafet ArrietaInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Chelsey LeruthInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Kate BonesInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Rebecca SteinfieldInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Johanna FigueroaInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Sonya Panjwani OlayaInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.
Pierre BarkerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) methods have been used extensively to support the delivery of safe, timely, effective, equitable, and cost-effective health care. While QI initiatives have demonstrated benefits, critical gaps in design and implementation undermine their impact. Systemic reviews and expert commentaries point to recurring challenges, including limited understanding and appreciation of the system in which the work takes place; poorly articulated aims; absence of guiding content theories for scalable implementation; weak implementation strategies; inadequate mechanisms for measurement, evaluation, and learning; and insufficiently structured approaches to communication and dissemination. These gaps limit learning, impact, replication, sustainability and scalability. To address these gaps, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the Core Components Guide, a practical framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating QI initiatives. Grounded in Deming's System of Profound Knowledge and the Model for Improvement, the guide includes six interrelated components: System Understanding, Improvement Aim, Measurement, Evaluation and Learning, Content Theory, Execution Theory, and Dissemination and Communication. Together, these components provide a structured approach to align interventions with context, clarify program theory, and embed iterative learning cycles. This manuscript introduces the Core Components, illustrates their application through a case study, and shares lessons learned from operationalizing the guide across diverse settings. By integrating improvement and implementation science principles, the Core Components Guide strengthens design, promotes fidelity, and increases the potential for impact, replication, scale, and sustainability of QI initiatives. This Guide offers actionable strategies for QI leaders and policymakers to build stronger foundations for improvement, evaluation, and dissemination.

Indexed as

core componentshealthcareimplementation scienceimprovement scienceQI designquality improvementquality improvement evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41960174
PMCPMC13057544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.