Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960109›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2026

Early outcomes of a formal robotic congenital cardiac surgery program.

Jack J Scala, David Blitzer, Michael LaLonde, Shonette Hing, Andrew B Goldstone, Emile Bacha, Arnar Geirsson, David M Kalfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack J ScalaSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
David BlitzerSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Michael LaLondeSection of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Shonette HingSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Andrew B GoldstoneSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Emile BachaSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Arnar GeirssonSection of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
David M KalfaSection of Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NY-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robotic cardiac surgery for congenital disease has been limited mainly to adult patients. Here we describe cardiac repairs in pediatric and adult patients with a variety of congenital lesions performed in a robotic cardiac surgery program. Methods: All patients undergoing robotic repair of congenital anomalies at the Children's Hospital of New York and Milstein Hospital between November 2023 and April 2025 were included. Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved using open or percutaneous femoral arterial and venous access, along with jugular venous access. Results: Twenty-six patients were identified, including 11 pediatric patients (range, age 6-19 years) and 15 adults (range, 22-63 years). The most frequent indications were secundum atrial septal defect (n = 14; 53.8%) and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (n = 7; 26.9%), including sinus venosus atrial septal defect (n = 4; 15.4%) and scimitar syndrome (n = 3; 11.5%). The median patient age and weight were 27.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 12.3-39.5 years) and 65.7 kg (IQR: 53.2-76.7 kg). The median length of stay was 4 days (IQR, 3-4.8 days). Aortic cross-clamping was achieved using a transthoracic clamp (n = 10) or endoaortic balloon (n = 15). No death, conversion to sternotomy, or reoperation occurred. Three cases of pleural effusion and 2 cases of pericarditis occurred. Conclusions: Robotic surgery is a safe and efficacious strategy for repairing selected congenital heart lesions across the lifespan. Adoption of robotic surgery in congenital heart disease likely will expand as comfort with the technology evolves.

Indexed as

atrial septal defectcongenital heart diseaserobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41960109
PMCPMC13059916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.