ArticleJTCVS open2026
Reducing treatment time and number of nerves treated fails to improve cryoanalgesia outcomes.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cryoanalgesia is an attractive method to improve postoperative pain. However, our randomized trial did not show significant reduction in pain or opioid use in adults undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery. We hypothesized that reducing the number of intercostal spaces and treatment time may decrease postoperative pain and narcotic consumption. Methods: In this quality improvement study, the quality improvement cohort received an intercostal nerve block with bupivacaine and lidocaine, and cryotherapy to 3 levels for 90 seconds. Outcomes from this cohort were compared with outcomes from our randomized trial cohorts: The cryoanalgesia cohort was treated with cryotherapy to 5 to 6 intercostal nerves for 120 seconds and intercostal nerve block, and the standard of care cohort was treated with intercostal nerve block only. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption up to the first postoperative visit measured by morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain and incentive spirometry volumes in the immediate postoperative period. Results: A total of 161 patients were analyzed (quality improvement N = 58, standard of care N = 52, cryoanalgesia N = 51). There was no difference in baseline characteristics, procedure type, or length of stay. There were no differences in inpatient or total morphine milligram equivalents up to the first postoperative visit. Outpatient morphine milligram equivalents were significantly higher in the quality improvement cohort ( Conclusions: Modifying the cryoanalgesia protocol to include fewer levels and less time did not improve opioid consumption, incentive spirometry, or pain scores in patients undergoing lung resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.