ArticleJTCVS open2026
Cryoablation for ground-glass nodules: Indications and short-term outcomes.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We prospectively applied cryoablation to nonsubpleural small ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with risk factors for growth (high-risk GGNs). Herein, we present our inclusion criteria and short-term outcomes. Methods: This is an interim report from a prospective, single-arm observational cohort study of cryoablation for high-risk GGNs. Inclusion criteria were GGN size between 8 and 20 mm; nonsubpleural GGNs; presence of risk factor for growth; clinically predicted as minimally invasive based on standardized uptake value and consolidation-to-tumor ratio; patients aged 20 to 65 years, those with a history of prior lung cancer surgery, or those with impaired pulmonary function test results; and provision of informed consent after thorough explanation. Exclusion criteria were GGNs located within 1 cm of a major vessel or main bronchus, evidence of nodal or distant metastasis, and severe coagulopathy. Results: A total of 14 patients underwent cryoablation for GGNs. The mean age was 68.1 ± 10.5 years. All patients had multiple GGNs, and 11 patients (78.6%) had a history of lung cancer surgery. Mean GGN size was 12 ± 5 mm with standardized uptake value 0.5 ± 0.6 and consolidation-to-tumor ratio 0.6 ± 0.3. All lesions were successfully encompassed within the target -40 °C isotherm zone with 10-mm safety margins. Only Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 complications occurred. The median hospital stay was 2 days. Conclusions: We have presented the indications of cryoablation for GGNs. This study demonstrates that cryoablation can be safely performed in carefully selected patients, achieving favorable short-term safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.