ArticleJTCVS open2026
Machine learning time-to-event algorithms for predicting the duration of ventilation after cardiac surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, and excessive hospital resource use. Accurate prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation duration can improve decision-making and patient outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate time-to-event models to predict the duration of ventilation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Methods: From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV databases, we extracted postoperative data from all cardiac surgery patients. We benchmarked 3 machine learning time-to-event algorithms (random survival forest, gradient boosted survival model, and survival support vector machine) against traditional Elastic-Net Cox regression. We evaluated model performance using weighted mean area under the curve ( Results: Models were trained on data from 10,430 cardiac surgery patients ventilated for a median of 7.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.4-16.0). Random survival forest had the highest Conclusions: Machine learning time-to-event models for prolonged mechanical ventilation and the duration of ventilation, particularly random survival forest and gradient boosted survival model, have significantly improved performance compared with current state-of-the-art tools and may be valuable decision supports in the postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.