ArticleJTCVS open2026
Association of hospital volume with perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive thymectomy.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Thymectomy is an uncommon procedure, and operative experience may influence outcomes. We examined the association between center-level operative volume using the National Readmissions Database (NRD) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). These databases provide complementary insights into short- and long-term outcomes. We hypothesized that perioperative morbidity would be similar in high-volume (HV) centers and low-volume (LV) centers, but long-term survival and R0 resection-especially for minimally invasive (MI) thymectomy-would be superior in HV centers. Methods: Patients from the NRD (2017-2020) and NCDB (2010-2015 and 2018-2021) diagnosed with thymoma or thymic carcinoma who underwent thymectomy were included. (NCDB 2016-2017 was excluded for missing stage data.) The top quartile defined HV centers from LV centers. The Pearson χ Results: In NRD analysis (n = 3127 patients), MI thymectomy was more frequent in HV centers (57.4% vs 40.9%: Conclusions: Perioperative outcomes were similar irrespective of center volume, but HV centers demonstrated improved rates of R0 resection and long-term survival even with an MI approach to thymectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.