ArticleJTCVS open2026
National race-based disparities in referral to Commission on Cancer centers for lung cancer resection.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Race-based disparities in lung cancer care are well described, such that Black patients face lower access to screening and early diagnosis, and inferior overall survival. We sought to examine race-based differences in referral to Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals for pulmonary resection. Methods: Within the National Cancer Database, we tabulated all patients aged 18 years or more of White or Black race diagnosed with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection from 2010 to 2022. Patients diagnosed at a separate institution from the operating facility were considered "referred," and those diagnosed and treated at the same center were considered "nonreferred." Hospitals in the top quartile by cumulative volume were considered high-volume centers (≥30 resections/year). Results: Of 123,706 patients, 33,218 (27%) were referred for care. After risk adjustment, Black race remained associated with a lower likelihood of referral (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80, CI, 0.77-0.85). Moreover, among those referred, Black race was associated with reduced odds of referral for care at high-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91, CI, 0.83-0.99). Referral for care was associated with a longer duration of waiting time from diagnosis to surgery (β + 28 days, CI, 28-29) and greater travel distance (β + 12 miles, CI, 11-13). Additionally, referral was linked with greater likelihood of receiving a minimally invasive operation and reduced odds of perioperative morbidity; referral to high-volume centers was associated with superior 5-year survival. Conclusions: Black patients faced a lower likelihood of referral for surgical care, reduced access to high-volume centers when referred, and longer waiting times from diagnosis to surgery. National efforts should seek to facilitate referral and ensure equitable access to high-quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.