ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Clinical application of regional cerebral oxygen saturation with disturbance coefficient in children with brain functional injury.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Pain, Agitation, and Intracranial Pressure with Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical value of monitoring cerebral oxygen saturation and disturbance coefficient in children with brain injury. Methods: This study enrolled 92 children with brain dysfunction admitted to the Intensive Care Medicine Department of Hebei Children's Hospital from March 2024 to May 2025 as the research group. They were divided into three subgroups based on age: 1-3, 3-6, and 6-16 years old. During the same period, 150 children who underwent outpatient health examinations were selected as the control group. General information (age, gender, etc.) was collected for both groups. Within 24 h of admission, the research group monitored and recorded DC and rSO Results: There was no statistically significant difference in age and gender between the two groups of patients ( Conclusion: DC and rSO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.