ArticleCureus2026
A Study on the Use of Nebulized Glycopyrronium in Hospitalized Patients With Exacerbations of Obstructive Airway Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilization Patterns of Nebulized Glycopyrronium in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbations of Obstructive Airway Disease (AEOAD)-Indian Expert Perspectives.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute exacerbations of obstructive airway diseases (OAD) are commonly encountered respiratory conditions that often require hospitalization and intensive bronchodilator therapy. While short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) and muscarinic antagonists (SAMAs) are commonly used, nebulized glycopyrronium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), may offer better outcomes. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study done across 278 sites to assess the overall utilization and effectiveness of nebulized glycopyrronium in managing exacerbations in hospitalized patients with obstructive airway disease in a real-world Indian setting. Medical records of hospitalized patients were analyzed, where nebulized glycopyrronium was used in the management of exacerbation for information regarding utilization and effectiveness. Outcomes included the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ward stay, oxygen requirement, ventilation support, adverse events, and mortality. Results A total of 2,780 medical records were analyzed across multiple tertiary care centers. The analyzed population had a mean age of 59.56 years (±9.72). Nebulized glycopyrronium was administered as combination therapy in 1,306 (48.44%) patients and as monotherapy in 1,390 (51.56%) patients. The majority of the patients (2,336, 90.61%) received twice-a-day (BID) dosing. The mean duration of glycopyrronium therapy was 13.45 days. A total of 68 adverse events were reported, most of which were mild and self-limiting. Dry mouth was the most frequent complaint (13, 0.46%), followed by dizziness and transient headache. Mortality was observed in 42 (1.52%) of the treated population, with no direct attribution to glycopyrronium therapy. Conclusion Nebulized glycopyrronium is an effective therapy in hospitalized patients with obstructive airway disease, offering faster recovery and reduced oxygen dependency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.