ReviewCureus2026
Navigating the Impossible Gallbladder: Bailout Strategies and Culture of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed abdominal procedures worldwide, yet it continues to carry significant risks, particularly bile duct injury and hemorrhage, which can have devastating consequences. The complexity of the operation arises largely from the variable anatomy of the hepatobiliary system, the presence of acute or chronic inflammation, and the surgeon's ability to recognize when anatomy is unsafe for dissection. A comprehensive understanding of gallstone pathogenesis, relevant surgical anatomy, and potential complications forms the foundation for safe practice. Over recent decades, the evolution of a "culture of safety" in cholecystectomy has emphasized universal principles such as the critical view of safety, B-SAFE landmarks (Bile duct, Sulcus of Rouvière, Arterial pulsations, Fissure, Enteric structure), and the role of Rouviere's sulcus in orientation. These strategies are complemented by the use of stopping rules, second opinions, and intraoperative imaging modalities such as cholangiography, laparoscopic ultrasound, and indocyanine-green fluorescence to reduce misidentification. Despite these precautions, situations frequently arise in which the critical view of safety cannot be achieved. In such cases, surgeons must be prepared to employ bailout strategies, including abortion of the procedure, conversion to open surgery, tube cholecystostomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, and the fundus-first approach. Subtotal cholecystectomy in particular has emerged as the most definitive bailout, supported by strong evidence and international guidelines, while other approaches provide situational pathways to safety. This review synthesizes current knowledge across pathogenesis, anatomy, complications, safe cholecystectomy principles, intraoperative adjuncts, and bailout procedures. By integrating technical evidence with consensus recommendations, it highlights the critical importance of surgical judgment and adherence to safety protocols in minimizing complications and ensuring favorable patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.