ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
The Use of Machine Learning to Enable Objective Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) is the most common type of isolated craniosynostosis, resulting in premature fusion of the sagittal suture and a scaphocephalic head shape. Surgical interventions, such as spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) and open calvarial vault remodeling (CVR), are often required to normalize skull morphology and improve functional outcomes. The Swap Disentangled Variational Autoencoder (SD-VAE) was used for the objective assessment of the SC phenotype and quantification of surgical outcomes after SAC and CVR, focusing on global and regional head shape relative to a healthy population. Methods: A dataset of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 3-dimensional photographs was used to train the SD-VAE on preoperative SC patients and healthy controls. Paired pre- and postoperative scans were analyzed to evaluate surgical outcomes. Data augmentation addressed class imbalance, and linear and quadratic discriminant analyses were used to visualize, classify, and quantify head shape morphology relative to the healthy norm. Results: For training, scans of 108 healthy children and 239 preoperative SC patients were included, with 21 CVR and 37 SAC pre- and postoperative pairs for evaluating surgical outcomes. The SD-VAE accurately distinguished SC patients from healthy controls based on global and regional morphology. Both SAC and CVR resulted in head shape normalization, with region-specific differences in effectiveness. Conclusions: By providing objective, global, and region-specific analysis of head shape and surgical outcomes, the SD-VAE enhances understanding of the SC phenotype and supports standardized outcome assessment. Future work will explore predictive applications and integration into clinical workflows for patient counseling and surgical planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.