Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Improving lung cancer screening in real-world settings: a pragmatic approach to provider education, barriers, and solutions.

Francesca C Duncan, Alejandro J Carrasco, Allie Carter, Marisa Pietrandrea, Edwin J Jackson, Catherine R Sears

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca C DuncanDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Alejandro J CarrascoDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Allie CarterDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Marisa PietrandreaDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Edwin J JacksonDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Catherine R SearsDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. While lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been shown to have a 20% relative reduction in mortality, the real-world benefit of screening has not been realized as screening of eligible individuals remains low. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a pivotal role in identifying eligible patients, initiating shared decision-making, and coordinating follow-up care, yet many report limited knowledge and confidence in implementing LCS. Provider education is a critical, scalable intervention to address these barriers and improve screening delivery in primary care. Pilot pragmatic trials are essential for evaluating real-world strategies to increase LCS uptake in primary care settings. Methods: We utilized a clinical advisory board of LCS experts to co-develop a 30-minute LCS education curriculum tailored for primary care providers (PCPs) at a safety-net hospital in Central Indiana and assessed its' impact on PCPs' knowledge of LCS guidelines, comfort with shared decision-making (SDM), communicating LDCT results, and confidence in managing post-screening care. Results: Following completion of the LCS education curriculum, primary care providers reported increased comfortability discussing LCS and LDCT results with their patients and increased familiarity with LCS eligibility criteria, which was reflected by improved application of screening guidelines to patient scenarios. LCS referrals by primary providers also increased following implementation of the LCS education curriculum. Discussion: Implementation of the LCS education curriculum led to improved provider comfort in discussing LCS with patients, confidence in managing next steps following LDCT results, increased knowledge of LCS eligibility, and application of screening criteria to patient scenarios, which was associated with an increased number of new referrals of eligible patients to the lung cancer screening program. Future aims can be developed to expand a LCS education curriculum beyond a single primary care clinic and digitize the curriculum into interactive modules, microlearning formats, and mobile-friendly platforms to enhance accessibility for providers.

Indexed as

barriers to lung cancer screeningearly detectionimplementation sciencelung cancer screeningpractice-based interventionsprimary careprovider educationsafety-net hospital

Identifiers

PMID41959891
PMCPMC13056817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.