ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Clinical Profile, Surgical Treatment, and Outcomes of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Training Hospital in the Philippines.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to examine the clinical profile, surgical management, and outcomes of patients admitted for ectopic pregnancy. Methods: A five-year retrospective study of ectopic pregnancies admitted in a tertiary training hospital in the Philippines was performed. Data from admission and operating room records were used to obtain the annual cumulative incidence of ectopic pregnancy. Subjects were divided into laparotomy versus laparoscopy groups, and salpingostomy versus salpingectomy groups; differences in the means/medians/mean-ranks and proportions of the different clinical and outcome variables of interest were compared by Student t test/Mann-Whitney U test and chisquare/Fisher exact test of homogeneity, respectively. Results: The cumulative incidence of ectopic pregnancy ranged from 2.30% to 4.01% from 2017 to 2021. A total of 128 patients were included in the final analysis with a mean age of 27.8 ± 5.73 years. The most common identified risk factors were smoking (17.97%), previous ectopic pregnancy (17.19%), and previous tubal surgery (15.62%). The ampulla was the most common site of tubal involvement. Of the 128 patients, 45.31% underwent laparotomy while 54.69% underwent laparoscopy. Salpingectomy was performed in 76.56% of patients. Tubal rupture was noted in 42.97% of cases. Patients with abdominal pain, back pain, shoulder pain, and dizziness were more likely to undergo laparotomy than laparoscopy ( Conclusions: The cumulative incidence of ectopic pregnancy in our institution was higher than global estimates. Risk factors and anatomic site of tubal involvement were similar to those reported in literature. Laparoscopy seemed to be underutilized for cases of ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Training on minimally invasive procedures should be provided to point-ofcare trainees or residents for patients to be afforded the benefits of laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.