ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Impact of sputum quality on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test results for tuberculosis: A multi-country study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rationale: Sputum-based testing using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) is the most common molecular testing method for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). Objectives: To evaluate whether sputum quality influences Xpert positivity and diagnostic accuracy. Methods: We screened consecutive people for presumptive TB in India, the Philippines, Vietnam, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia as part of the R2D2 TB Network and ADAPT studies. Participants provided 2-3 sputum samples for Xpert and culture reference testing. The quality of the first sputum sample was graded following standardized procedures by trained research staff and used for Xpert testing. We performed logistic regression to evaluate whether sputum grade was independently associated with Xpert positivity, and calculated sensitivity and specificity of Xpert against a culture-based microbiological reference standard (MRS). Measurements and Main Results: Among 1,855 participants, 798 (43%) were female, 348 (19%) were living with HIV (PLHIV), and 1795 (97%) had a cough of ≥2 weeks. Overall, 313 (17%) had a positive Xpert result. Most sputum samples were salivary (83%). Xpert positivity was lowest among salivary samples (16.1%) and highest among purulent samples (31.2%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, there was no significant association between any sputum grade and Xpert positivity. Xpert sensitivity (salivary: 89%, mucoid: 91%, mucopurulent: 87%, purulent: 100%) and specificity (>98%) were high across sputum grades. Conclusions: Sputum quality was not independently associated with Xpert positivity and Xpert sensitivity was high across all sputum grades. These findings support molecular testing of all sputum samples for TB diagnosis regardless of macroscopic appearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.