ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
A Simplified Classification for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Based on Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: As optical coherence tomography (OCT) has enabled the identification of an expanding set of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk biomarkers and become central to routine clinical practice, there remains a need for a simplified grading scheme that allows physicians to communicate and synchronize AMD grading directly from standard OCT imaging rather than relying on traditional color fundus imaging. This study aims to establish a standardized OCT-based AMD classification that balances diagnostic accuracy with practicality for use across clinical and research settings. Patients and Methods: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans were independently graded by two retinal specialists following the newly proposed Stanford OCT-Based AMD Classification (SOAC). Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third independent retinal specialist. Intergrader agreement was assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. Results: Among the 109 eyes from 108 patients (mean age 79.61 ± 7.57 years; 41.7% male, 58.3% female), AMD staging based on SOAC was distributed as follows: normal aging in 9 patients (8.3%), early AMD in 16 (14.7%), intermediate AMD in 32 (29.4%), neovascular AMD (nAMD) in 18 (16.5%), geographic atrophy (GA) in 20 (18.3%), and combined nAMD and GA in 14 (12.8%). The overall intergrader agreement demonstrated robust consistency, with a weighted kappa value of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), signifying excellent intergrader reliability and reinforcing the validity of SOAC. Conclusion: SOAC provides a standardized, OCT-based framework for AMD grading that demonstrates high intergrader agreement. By enabling consistent classification from commonly acquired OCT scans, SOAC supports reliable disease staging and facilitates integration across clinical studies and translational research. As imaging and molecular data continue to expand, SOAC can serve as a common OCT-based reference for phenotype refinement and longitudinal AMD studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.