Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959762›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Using Multimodal Deep Learning Integrating Lesion and Normal-Appearing White Matter: A Retrospective Study with International Multicentre External Validation.

Jiajian Ma, Valentin Stepanov, Wushuang Rui, Hsuan-Chih Chen, Maciej Lis, Aleksandra Stanek, Tomasz Puto, Michael Lan, Jenny Chen, Timothy Liu and 9 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jiajian MaCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4614-0804
Valentin StepanovDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0007-8054
Wushuang RuiDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-0214-0605
Hsuan-Chih ChenCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Maciej LisClinical Imaging Diagnostics Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-659X
Aleksandra StanekClinical Imaging Diagnostics Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz PutoClinical Imaging Diagnostics Center, 5th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Krakow, 30-901 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-7095-7619
Michael LanDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jenny ChenDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy LiuNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3115-1537
Roshni PatelDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew BreenDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6942-5164
Matthew LeeDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8816-1076
Katharina Eikermann-HaerterDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy M ShepherdDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0232-1636
Dmitry S NovikovDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4213-3050
Kimberly A O'NeillDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6021-8683
Els FieremansDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-8591
Yiqiu ShenDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-2514

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel K Sodickson · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Mesoscopic Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration with Diffusion MRIR01NS088040 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIEREMANS, ELS, NOVIKOV, DMITRY S · 2014 to 2023
$5.2M
Random Matrix Theory-Based Noise Removal in MRIR01EB027075 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIEREMANS, ELS, NOVIKOV, DMITRY S · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
Leveraging Multi-Modal AI for Selective Use of Ultrasound in Breast Cancer ScreeningR01EB036530 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Alana Amarosa Lewin, Yiqiu Shen · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027075NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036530NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis relies primarily on focal white matter lesions (WMLs), which are frequently mimicked by other conditions. Normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) harbours complementary pathological information but remains clinically underutilised because NAWM alterations are macroscopically occult on routine scans and require non-routine quantitative imaging to visualise. Here, we show that NAWM-related diagnostic information can be recovered from routine structural MRI using a cross-modal deep-learning model. We developed DeepMS, a model co-trained on diffusion and structural MRI that operates solely on structural MRI at deployment. DeepMS achieved ROC-AUCs of 0.968 internally (n=837) and 0.940-0.974 across two international external cohorts (n=293 and n=1,756). In a multi-reader study, DeepMS outperformed the 2024 McDonald criteria imaging biomarkers. DeepMS retained robust performance after digital lesion removal and exhibited NAWM-dominant activation maps. Combined with established imaging biomarkers, DeepMS improved sensitivity (92.1% vs 74.8%) while maintaining high specificity (95.6% vs 92.3%) compared with corresponding biomarker composite based on the 2024 McDonald criteria. By decoding latent NAWM signals from routine scans and integrating them with WML features, this framework can potentially advance MS diagnosis beyond the current lesion-centric paradigm.

Identifiers

PMID41959762
PMCPMC13060985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.