ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2025
Remote pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence monitoring among young, Black men who have sex with men: a feasibility and acceptability pilot study.
Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Young, Black, gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM) experience disproportionate HIV incidence and are a priority population for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In addition to understanding barriers to PrEP initiation, it is imperative that we also understand patterns of adherence and persistence on PrEP among young, Black GBMSM who have started PrEP. Understanding factors associated with PrEP adherence and persistence will facilitate the development of interventions to encourage effective PrEP use. We conducted a study to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using frequent, online, self-administered surveys to assess recent sexual behavior and PrEP use over six months among young, Black GBMSM on PrEP. Participants completed brief surveys weekly for three months followed by monthly surveys through month six. They were also asked to submit a self-collected dried blood spot to provide a biological measure of PrEP adherence at months three and six. Feasibility was measured via completion percentages for the surveys and dried blood spot collection; acceptability was measured via qualitative data collected during in-depth interviews. Overall, 71% of participants completed at least 80% of study surveys and 64% returned at least one dried blood spot specimen. Most study procedures were reported to be acceptable, although some participants did have some difficulties using the study app to complete surveys. Short, frequent, self-administered surveys and self-collected dried blood spots were found to be feasible and acceptable methods to measure PrEP adherence and persistence among young, Black GBMSM and might form the basis for future adherence interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.