ArticleHemaSphere2026
Erdheim-Chester disease associated with myeloid neoplasm: Clinical features, molecular landscape, and treatment outcomes.
Article in HemaSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is frequently associated with clonal hematopoiesis and myeloid neoplasms (MN), but clinical phenotype and response to kinase inhibitors (KI) in this setting remain unclear. We analyzed 67 patients with ECD associated with MN (ECD-MN) from a French national cohort and assessed ECD treatment response, MN progression, and leukemic transformation. Outcomes were compared with those of 348 patients with ECD without MN. ECD-MN were characterized by low blast counts and favorable MN prognostic scores. Compared with ECD patients without MN, those with MN were older (median 65 vs. 59 years, P < 0.0001) and had more frequent cardiac (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.01), pulmonary (48% vs. 31%, P < 0.01), gastrointestinal (34% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001), and lymph node involvement (31% vs. 8%, P < 0.0001). KI therapy led to higher ECD response rates at 6 and 12 months compared with pegylated-interferon α (Peg-IFN) (96% vs. 58%, P = 0.02). MN progression and leukemic transformation at 6 months occurred, respectively, in 25% and 3% of KI-treated patients versus 25% and 18% of those treated with Peg-IFN. After a median follow-up of 25 (12-38) months on KI, the mutational landscape remained unchanged. Median overall survival was shorter in patients with MN (76 vs. 163 months, P < 0.001). In conclusion, ECD associated with MN represents a distinct clinical entity, marked by broader organ involvement and poorer prognosis. KI therapy provides a superior response without increasing the risk of MN progression or leukemic transformation, supporting its use as a frontline treatment in this population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.