ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Cross-sectoral integration can support reproductive choice, violence reduction and social cohesion: experiences from a climate-stressed district of rural Uganda.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate change, livelihoods, gender and violence in Rukiga, Uganda: Intersections and pathways.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate and environmental stresses have a disproportionate impact on women and girls, acting as a trigger for intimate partner violence (IPV) and compromising access to needed sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) services. Little is known about the impact of cross-sector programmes and services, and programmes responding to these linked crises remain siloed. This paper examines the effect of a novel partnership between environmental protection and livelihoods NGOs and government health services providing integrated programmes in a climate-stressed rural district in Uganda. Methods: Qualitative research examined whether and how integrated programmes could lead to improvements in IPV, SRHR and wider gender equity in eight villages in Rukiga, Uganda. Forty-four focus group discussions in integrated and non-integrated ("parallel") sites gathered lived experiences comparing pre- and post-intervention between April 2021-December 2023. Results: Over time, although participants still described food insecurity, poverty and IPV (prevalent at baseline) many also reported positive shifts in IPV-triggers including gender-dynamics and male attitudes towards family planning (FP). Overall, participants in integrated sites reported increased male acceptance of family planning-reducing a potential IPV trigger - and greater community support for women's economic participation. Integrated delivery that engaged all adults in livelihoods as well as reproductive health activities helped disrupt gendered information (and practice) silos and promote greater reported community cohesion supporting women's legitimate participation in economic activities alongside better male support for women's reproductive rights. Discussion: Findings suggest that integrated programmes pairing climate-resilient livelihood strategies with rights-based family planning and reproductive health services can enhance reproductive choice for women and help address root-causes of IPV, reproductive coercion and abuse by partners. Protecting women's reproductive rights and wider social wellbeing in the context of severe climate stress means health services and systems must move beyond siloed SRHR programming and service delivery, to embrace partnerships with organisations tackling linked livelihoods and wider wellbeing issues. To be effective, health services and systems must explicitly embed gender-responsive and justice-oriented approaches that ensure the safety of women while addressing persistent inequalities, resource scarcity, and power dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.