ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Reproductive health seeking behaviour and its determinants in Indian women-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reproductive health-seeking behaviour is critical to maternal health and overall well-being, yet many reproductive disorders remain underdiagnosed and contribute substantially to morbidity in India. Health-seeking for reproductive health conditions is often limited by symptom normalization, stigma, lack of awareness, and restricted access to female healthcare providers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the prevalence of health-seeking behaviour for reproductive morbidities among Indian women and to summarise key factors influencing care utilisation. Methods: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024562508), and the review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to January 29, 2026, for studies reporting reproductive health-seeking behaviour among women in India. Eligible studies addressed reproductive morbidities, including menstrual disorders, gynecological infections, pregnancy complications, menopause-related problems, infertility, structural abnormalities, including uterine prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal prolapse, and chronic pelvic pain. Data were extracted, risk of bias was assessed, and quantitative findings were synthesized using a meta-analysis of proportions with the inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was examined using Cochran's Q and the I Results: The pooled prevalence of reproductive morbidities among women was 41.5% (95% CI: 31.2%-52.7%). Overall, 54.8% (95% CI: 46.0%-63.4%) sought treatment for at least one morbidity. Among care seekers, 31.4% used government facilities and 54.7% used private facilities. Allopathic medicine was the most common treatment modality (66%), followed by home remedies (27.9%), AYUSH therapies (12.7%), and over-the-counter medications (15.4%). While 47% perceived no need for treatment, the key barriers included symptom normalisation (60%), embarrassment (16.3%), lack of awareness (13.5%), financial constraints (12.3%), communication difficulties (27.3%), and distance to facilities (8.4%). Conclusion: This SRMA highlights substantial gaps in health-seeking among Indian women with reproductive morbidities, with only about half seeking formal treatment. Education and socioeconomic status remain key determinants of health-seeking, while limited awareness and poor knowledge of reproductive health services continue to impede timely treatment. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024562508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.