ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Characterizing β-lactam allergy prevalence among patients receiving infectious disease specialty care within a large US healthcare system in Washington.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Unverified drug allergies pose a significant barrier to successful antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Most delabelling efforts to date have occurred within an inpatient setting or through outpatient evaluations with an allergy specialist; limited data exist examining β-lactam allergies and delabelling efforts among diverse and underserved populations. Strategies are needed to better identify priority populations for allergy delabelling efforts and the highest-yield opportunities for intervention. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of penicillin allergy labels (PALs) or cephalosporin allergy labels (CALs) among patients receiving infectious diseases (ID) specialty care across multiple academic and community-based settings and to characterize reported reactions and referral patterns to allergy specialists. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of patients with PAL or CAL receiving care within seven outpatient specialty ID clinics and five inpatient ID consultation services within a large health system between 1 April 2021 and 31 December 2024. Patients: Inclusion criteria for this study were patients >18 years old with a PAL or CAL listed in the electronic health record who received care at one of the above described clinics during the study time frame. Results: Among 4951 patients with a reported PAL or CAL, most were male (56%; Conclusions: High rates of penicillin and cephalosporin allergy labels, the majority of which reflect low-risk reactions, demonstrate a real ongoing need for innovative strategies to maximize delabelling efforts for patients with unverified drug allergies and infectious care needs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.