Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959676›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Atypical integration of temporal evidence and priors in causality judgment along the autism-schizotypy continuum.

Gianluca Marsicano, Michele Deodato, David Melcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gianluca MarsicanoPsychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Michele DeodatoPsychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
David MelcherPsychology Program, Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual inference arises from integrating sensory evidence with prior knowledge. Causality perception-deciding whether one event causes another-offers a window into this process. We examined how prior experience and individual differences shape causal inference in 150 neurotypical individuals spanning the autism-schizotypy (ASD-SSD) spectrum. Participants judged causality in dynamic collision events with varying temporal delays. Causality judgments were influenced by physical timing (sensory driven) and serial dependence on previous decisions (prior driven). SSD-like individuals showed the strongest serial dependence and ASD-like individuals the weakest. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling revealed increased causality bias and lower decision thresholds in SSD-like individuals, reflecting a prior-dominated style. ASD-like individuals showed reduced perceptual-history influence and higher thresholds, indicating a sensory-driven approach. Crucially, prior biases and perceptual history were interrelated, suggesting a hierarchical organization of perceptual inference across timescales and linking causality perception to predictive processes shaped by distinct cognitive-perceptual profiles.

Indexed as

behavioral neurosciencecognitive neurosciencesensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41959676
PMCPMC13059111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.