Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959656›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Explainable and reproducible AI: culturally responsive AI for health equity in minoritized groups.

Michelle King-Okoye, Harriett Fuller, Kuan Tan, Nick Marlow, Jacques Fleuriot, Chris Tzatzakis, Sweekrity Kanodia, Kenneth Odoh, Keerthi Dubbala, Jefferson Alvarez Alvarez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michelle King-Okoye *Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Harriett Fuller *Health Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Kuan TanAdelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nick MarlowAdelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jacques FleuriotHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Chris TzatzakisHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Sweekrity KanodiaHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Kenneth OdohHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Keerthi DubbalaHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.
Jefferson Alvarez AlvarezHealth Equity Research Consortium (HERC), London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by enabling advanced diagnostics, personalized treatments, and improved operational efficiencies. By identifying complex data patterns and correlations, AI could supplement clinical decision-making, enabling more rapid diagnoses and treatment decisions tailored to meet the unique needs of diverse communities. However, realizing these benefits requires that clinical AI models be consistent, reliable, and validated across diverse populations and clinical environments. In addition, as these data patterns and correlations may often be unexpected, AI models require more explainability compared to other medical technologies. This is especially true for complex models, where the processes driving a model to make a prediction are often unclear and uninterpretable to both model developers and medical professionals, resulting in AI models frequently being described as "black boxes". To address this fundamental challenge of interpretability, explainable AI (XAI) has emerged as a critical approach, providing insight (often in a

Indexed as

AIculturally responsive AIethnic minoritiesexplainabilityreproducibilitytrust building and communication

Identifiers

PMID41959656
PMCPMC13058911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.