ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Flipper: An advanced framework for identifying differential RNA binding behavior with eCLIP data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) methods remain the gold standard for characterizing RNA binding protein (RBP) behavior. As a result, many researchers rely on CLIP to assess how treatments targeting RBPs alter binding patterns and regulatory activity. However, current tools for differential RBP binding analysis lack core features required for rigorous statistical inference, including proper normalization and appropriate handling of replicate experiments. Furthermore, existing approaches cannot adequately separate expression driven effects from true changes in RBP binding, complicating interpretation of differential analyses. Addressing these limitations is essential for producing reproducible and informative analyses of differential RBP binding. Results: Here we present Flipper, an application purpose built for the analysis of differential RBP binding. Flipper introduces several innovations that adapt the DESeq2 framework for robust differential analysis of eCLIP count data. These include integration of input controls to account for expression driven binding shifts, hierarchical normalization strategies that adjust for technical variation without confounding signal to noise ratios, and improved post-differential analysis tools. We demonstrate that Flipper exhibits high specificity when applied to real differential eCLIP data while also providing deeper biological insights. In addition, analyses of both real and simulated data indicate that Flipper achieves superior sensitivity and precision compared with existing approaches. Together, these results highlight Flipper as a robust and generalizable framework for differential RBP binding analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.