Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959401›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Cognitive reappraisal of food and emotion cues involves common and unique neural contributions.

Julia M Laing-Young, Cary R Savage, Cara Tomaso, Maital Neta, Timothy D Nelson, Douglas H Schultz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia M Laing-YoungCenter for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.ORCID 0000-0001-7950-4196
Cary R SavageCenter for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Cara TomasoDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Maital NetaCenter for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Timothy D NelsonCenter for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Douglas H SchultzCenter for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
Modifiable predictors of neural vulnerabilities for obesityR01DK125651 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI NELSON, TIMOTHY DAVID, SAVAGE, CARY R · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
The Neuroscience of Obesity: Developing Executive Control, Neural Processes, and Obesity RiskF31DK122636 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI TOMASO, CARA CELINE · 2020 to 2022
$103k
NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK122636NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125651NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a growing public health concern with more than 40% of adults meeting criteria for obesity in the United States. Although many treatments seek to lower individual's weight, few treatments have focused on cognitive strategies to change the way individuals think about food, therefore, decreasing consumption of non-nutrient-dense foods. Cognitive reappraisal is one strategy that involves changing the way one thinks about a situation and can be used to downregulate responses to those stimuli. Leveraging this intuitive, cost-effective strategy to decrease one's desire to eat unhealthy food and therefore, decrease overeating, could improve physical and mental health. The present study identified brain regions that are differentially activated when using cognitive reappraisal to downregulate responses to food (FR) versus when using the same strategy to downregulate negative emotions (ER). We collected functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in 63 undergraduate students while participants completed both tasks. There was increased reappraisal-related activation in widespread regions across both tasks, including in expected subcortical (i.e., striatum) and cortical areas (i.e., visual, frontoparietal). We also found domain-specific activity, with greater insula activation in the FR than the ER task and greater hippocampal activation in the ER than the FR task. These results reveal domain-general and domain-specific effects of cognitive reappraisal in FR and ER tasks that inform future work examining eating behavior. Taken together, a better explication of the overlapping and discrete processes of food regulation, as it compares to other applications of this regulatory strategy can inform new intervention targets.

Identifiers

PMID41959401
PMCPMC13060841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.