ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Charge Based Boundary Element Method with Residual Driven Adaptive Mesh Refinement for High Resolution Electrical Stimulation Modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and electroencephalography (EEG) forward modeling requires resolving numerical singularities in the charge density near electrodes and tissue interfaces. We present an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) strategy for the charge based boundary element method (BEM) accelerated by the fast multiple method (BEM-FMM) including electrode and interface singularities. We derive a new error estimator which considers both local and nonlocal contributions of the single-layer potential operator and construct a refinement criterion based on the difference in charge solution across AMR iterations. We evaluate this approach on a 5-layer sphere model and on multiple subject-specific head models derived from the 7-tissue SimNIBS (headreco) and 40-tissue Sim4Life (head40) segmentations, using both voltage-controlled and current-controlled electrode formulations. Through convergence analysis on the white matter and deep hippocampal targets, we find electric fields with relative residual errors below 0.1% and 1% for SimNIBS and Sim4Life models, respectively. Our results indicate that the residual based AMR applied to BEM-FMM leads to numerically stable TES and EEG forward solutions in realistic head models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.