ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
From sound to source: Human and model recognition of environmental sounds.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our ability to recognize sound sources in the world is critical to daily life, but is not well documented or understood in computational terms. We developed a large-scale behavioral benchmark of human environmental sound recognition, built stimulus-computable models of sound recognition, and used the benchmark to compare models to humans. The behavioral benchmark measured how sound recognition varied across source categories, audio distortions, and concurrent sound sources, all of which influenced recognition performance in humans. Artificial neural network models trained to recognize sounds in multi-source scenes reached near-human accuracy and qualitatively matched human patterns of performance in many conditions. By contrast, traditional models of the cochlea and auditory cortex that were trained to recognize sounds produced worse matches to human performance. Models trained on larger datasets exhibited stronger alignment with both human behavior and brain responses. The results suggest that many aspects of human sound recognition emerge in systems optimized for the problem of real-world recognition. The benchmark results set the stage for future explorations of auditory scene perception involving salience and attention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.