Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959299›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Acoustic Salience Drives Pupillary Dynamics in an Interrupted, Reverberant Task.

Victoria I Figarola, Wusheng Liang, Sahil Luthra, Eric W Parker, Matthew B Winn, Christopher A Brown, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria I FigarolaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5231-8622
Wusheng LiangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-8276
Sahil LuthraDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-2609
Eric W ParkerMellon College of Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Matthew B WinnDepartment of Speech-Language Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Christopher A BrownDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorder, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, United States.
Barbara Shinn-CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-5914

Funding

Training in Auditory and Vestibular NeuroscienceT32DC011499 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Karl Kandler, BILL J YATES · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
Cortical processing of informational maskingR01DC019126 · NIDCD · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2020 to 2025
$1.3M
How spatial cues support communication: Interactions between auditory spatial features and task demands across cortical networksR01DC022699 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOPHER A BROWN, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham · 2025 to 2026
$1.2M
Modifying spatial maps to improve localizationR21DC018408 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER A · 2020 to 2021
$416k
Mechanisms of auditory selective attention for speech and non-speech stimuliF32DC020625 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI LUTHRA, SAHIL · 2022 to 2025
$197k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC020625NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019126NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC022699NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018408NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC011499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners face many challenges when trying to maintain attention to a target source in everyday settings; for instance, reverberation distorts acoustic cues and interruptions capture attention. However, little is known about how these challenges affect the ability to maintain selective attention. Here, we measured syllable recall accuracy and pupil dilation during a spatial selective attention task that was sometimes disrupted. Participants heard two competing, temporally interleaved syllable streams presented in pseudo-anechoic or reverberant environments. On randomly selected trials, a sudden interruption occurred mid-sequence. Compared to anechoic trials, reverberant performance was worse overall, and the interrupter disrupted performance. In uninterrupted trials, reverberation reduced peak pupil dilation both when it was consistent across all stimuli in a block and when it was randomized trial to trial, suggesting temporal smearing reduced clarity of the scene and the salience of events in the ongoing streams. Pupil dilations in response to interruptions indicated perceptual salience was strong across reverberant and anechoic conditions. Specifically, baseline pupil size before trials did not vary across room conditions, and mixing or blocking of trials (altering stimulus expectations) had no impact on pupillary responses. Together, these findings highlight that stimulus salience drives cognitive load more strongly than does task performance.

Identifiers

PMID41959299
PMCPMC13060271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.