ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Network pharmacology-based discovery and experimental validation of novel drug repurposing candidates in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence implicating genetic variants and proteins encoded by them with risk and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), this knowledge has not been successfully translated into effective AD treatments. We integrated current genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of AD into a network pharmacology framework that leverages comprehensive gene-gene and drug-target interactions. This approach allowed us to screen 2,413 drugs for repurposing opportunities in AD. Computational validation and drug prioritization was followed by experimental validation in 33 cell culture-based phenotypic assays combined with Bayesian hypothesis testing. Our network-based screen rediscovered drugs in clinical trials for AD, providing computational validation. Besides many cancer drugs, the screen identified three drugs previously implicated in AD-related endophenotypes: the primary bile acid chenodiol, arundine (3,3'-diindolylmethane), and cysteamine. In analysis of results from culture-based phenotypic assays, large Bayes factors supported the hypothesized benefits of arundine and the chenodiol derivative, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), in amyloid-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.