ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Comparative Genomics Reveals the Ancestral Recombination Landscape of Placental Mammals.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is a crucial biological process that ensures proper chromosomal pairing and promotes adaptation. In placental mammals, recombination rates vary widely across species, populations, sexes, individuals, and chromosomes. While the placental X chromosome shows remarkable conservation of both gene order and the recombination landscape across deep evolutionary history, it is unknown whether similar levels of autosomal conservation persist despite extensive chromosomal evolution. Here, we reconstructed an ancestral placental mammal karyotype from chromosome-level assemblies, using slow rates of karyotypic evolution, and inferred an ancestral autosomal recombination map. Analysis of phylogenetic branch lengths and PhyloP-based scores of evolutionary constraint reveals that conserved autosomal regions with low recombination rates have evolved under stronger purifying selection, whereas regions with conserved high recombination rates are less constrained and freer to evolve. Ancestral autosomal regions with low recombination rates were enriched for pathways and GO terms related to cellular function, whereas ancestral regions with high recombination rates were enriched for regulation and some immune-related systems. Tracking the fate of these conserved ancestral recombination hotspots and coldspots across 13 mammal lineages with variable rates of karyotype evolution revealed the retention of autosomal AHRs, but the absence of autosomal ALR conservation. Collectively, our findings reveal variable levels of evolutionary constraint at meiotic recombination in relation to karyotypic evolution, providing new insights into how natural selection influences the evolution of chromosomal organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.