ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Causes and consequences of unawareness (anosognosia) of tool-action errors after left-hemisphere stroke.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many individuals with limb apraxia after left-hemisphere stroke exhibit a lack of awareness of their tool-related action errors, i.e., unawareness of apraxia (UA; also called anosognosia of apraxia). Little is known about the prevalence of UA, the relationship between UA and apraxia severity, or its underlying mechanisms. Here, we assessed both the causes and consequences of UA. Based on a mechanistic model, we hypothesized that UA may arise because of deficits in representations signaling how tool-related movements should look and feel-a component of action knowledge-and that degradation of this knowledge impedes the detection of mismatches between planned and actual tool-related actions. We further predicted that a consequence of UA is a reduction in error-correction attempts. Fifty-six individuals with chronic LCVA gestured to show how to use tools. Immediately after the gesture production task, participants were asked if they made any errors. All participants also completed an action knowledge task to measure the integrity of tool-related movement goals. Individuals were denoted as exhibiting UA if they performed below a normative cutoff for apraxia yet reported making no errors. Our sample included 21 individuals with apraxia; of these, nearly half (48%) exhibited UA. These two groups made a comparable number of gesture errors and were of equivalent stroke severity, yet individuals with UA had significantly more impaired action knowledge. Additionally, individuals with UA were less likely to attempt to correct their errors compared to individuals who were aware of their apraxia. These data support the hypothesis that action knowledge (how tool actions look and feel) serves a key role in error detection and awareness of apraxia and may contribute to the difficulties with everyday tasks experienced by many people with apraxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.