ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Adoption of MMPose, a general purpose pose estimation library, for animal tracking.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Markerless pose estimation has emerged as a powerful technique for animal behavior quantification, capable of high resolution tracking of body parts. Many neuroscience labs rely on tools like DeepLabCut and SLEAP, which provide accessible interfaces but restrict users to a narrow set of models and configurations. In this work, we adopt MMPose an open source, general-purpose computer vision library to build a workflow for training and evaluating multiple state-of-the-art models on animal video datasets. We benchmark these models in two scenarios: (1) a complex maze assay with occlusions and varied backgrounds, and (2) a simpler open field arena with a high-contrast background. Our results show that a bottom-up model (DEKR) delivers the highest accuracy in the complex task, whereas lighter-weight models (e.g., SLEAP) offer superior speed highlighting a clear trade-off between accuracy and throughput. We also evaluate a recently published foundation model (TopViewMouse-5K) trained on a large top-view mouse dataset to test its generalization. It performs poorly on our tasks at zero-shot, and even when we combine its data with our training set, we observe no consistent benefit. These findings emphasize the importance of context-specific model selection and the need for more diverse training data to create generalizable pose models. By leveraging a general-purpose vision library, researchers can flexibly choose models that best suit their experimental needs. This work illustrates how adopting advanced computer vision frameworks can accelerate behavioral neuroscience and genetics research, paving the way for more scalable, reproducible, and sensitive analysis of animal behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.