ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The geometry of dominance shows broad potential for stable polymorphism under antagonistic pleiotropy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alleles with opposing effects on fitness characters are said to exhibit selectional antagonistic pleiotropy (broadly construed so that effects are not necessarily confined to the same individual). A number of theoretical investigations considered the case where a pair of alleles at a locus influences two fitness components and derived the conditions giving rise to stable polymorphism under various assumptions about the mode of trait-interaction. Strikingly, many of these analyses concluded that the potential for maintaining polymorphism is strongly constrained by the joint influence of two factors: (1) the prevalence of weak selection coefficients over coefficients of large magnitude, and (2) the absence of beneficial dominance reversals (where the deleterious effects of each allele are partially or completely masked in the heterozygous genotype). Consequently, the conclusion that selective polymorphism is unlikely to be maintained by intralocus mechanisms of antagonistic pleiotropy has achieved widespread acceptance. Here we argue that such conclusions do not apply to any of the following models of antagonism: (i) additive trait-interaction, (ii) multiplicative trait-interaction, (iii) bivoltine selection, (iv) soft selection, (v) hard selection, and (vi) sexual antagonism. We demonstrate that the parameter space giving rise to stable allelic variation is quite large throughout, and moreover, the plenitude of suitable parameters neither depends on the strength of selection nor requires dominance reversal. Dominance coefficients associated with stringent conditions for stable polymorphism are shown to be atypical as compared to all feasible parameters, and best regarded as an outcome of adherence to a special relation: dominance with a constant magnitude and direction, which includes the case of additive allelic effects at a locus. Properties of single-locus equilibria (heterozygosity, allele frequency differentiation) are investigated, as well as the contribution of dominance schemes to the genetic variance in fitness characters in populations at multilocus linkage equilibrium.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.