ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Stochastic Gene Expression Model with State-Dependent Protein Activation Delay.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells must maintain stable protein levels despite the inherently stochastic nature of gene expression, as excessive fluctuations can disrupt cellular function and impair the reliability of decision-making. Regulatory mechanisms, such as negative feedback, buffer protein fluctuations. Yet, it remains unclear how fluctuations are affected by delays that depend on a molecule's specific state. Here, we develop a stochastic model in which proteins are produced in bursts as inactive molecules and pass through a series of intermediate steps before becoming active. The duration of such activation delays depends on the current level of active protein, creating a state-dependent feedback loop. Our model provides explicit analytical expressions relating the delay structure and feedback strength to the variability of active protein levels, quantified using the Fano factor, and shows that state-dependent delays can reduce fluctuations below the baseline expected from simple bursty production. Stochastic simulations confirm these predictions, and incorporating negative feedback in burst production further decreases variability while keeping system behavior predictable. These results reveal how temporal and state-dependent regulation stabilizes protein expression, offering guidance for understanding natural cellular control and designing robust synthetic gene circuits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.